Member Participation

In accordance with the founding purpose of the Herodicus Society, it is requested that only NEW presentations on research, studies, cases, and controversial approaches are presented at the Annual Meeting. The presentations DO NOT need to be finished and ready for publication – rather, it is encouraged to present raw, provocative, and thought-provoking information to invoke a healthy debate.

Active members are required to:

  • Submit a scientific presentation once in every 3-year period
  • Attend the annual meeting twice in every 3-year period
  • Attend at least two (2) days of the 3-day annual meeting
  • Pay all dues and assessments prior to registering for the annual meeting

Deadline: February 1st, 2026
Submission for presentations for the 2026 Annual Meeting is now closed.


Program Overview: June 14-17, 2026

**Times are approximate**

Sunday,
June 14
Monday,
June 15
Tuesday,
June 16
Wednesday,
June 17
Working Breakfast (Case Discussions) 6:30 AM - 7:30 AM 6:30 AM - 7:30 AM 6:30 AM - 7:30 AM
Scientific Sessions 7:45 AM - 12:00 PM 7:45 AM - 12:00 PM 7:45 AM - 12:00 PM
Working Lunch (Members Only)
Business Meeting and Case Presentations
12:15 PM - 2:00 PM
Working Lunch
12:15 PM - 2:00 PM
Working Lunch
Adjourn at 1:00 PM
Evening Events Welcome Reception
6:00 – 9:00 PM
Annual Banquet
6:00 – 9:00 PM

Interactive Agenda

06:45 - 07:24
Breakfast
The Social Lawn
07:25 - 07:29

Welcome and Introductions

The Social (General Session)

07:25 - 07:27 Welcome from the President
 
    President: Walt R Lowe, MD
 
 
       
07:28 - 07:29 Welcome from the Vice President and Program Chair
 
    Chair: Matthew T. Provencher, MD, MBA
 
 
       
07:30 - 08:14

Case Presentations 1

The Social (General Session)

07:30 - 08:14 My Toughest Knee and Sports Cases – What I Got Wrong and What I Did to Fix
 
    John M Tokish, MD
 
    Panelist: Christopher S Ahmad, MD
 
    Panelist: Robert Arciero, MD
 
    Panelist: Asheesh Bedi, MD
 
    Panelist: Lutul Dashaun Farrow, MD
 
 
       
08:15 - 09:04

Paper Session 1: Knee – Ligaments Part 1

The Social (General Session)

    Moderator: Thomas J Gill, MD
Moderator: Jeffrey Alan Guy, MD
   
08:15 - 08:20 Improved Graft Survival in Revision Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Over 20 Years: A Cohort Study of 958 Patients from the SANTI Study Group
 
    Bertrand Sonnery-Cottet, MD, PhD
 
   
Description
Purpose: To evaluate the long-term evolution of graft survival after revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (rACLR) and to determine whether contemporary surgical strategies—specifically lateral extra-articular procedures (LEAP) and systematic posteromedial meniscal management—are associated with reduced graft failure. Methods: This retrospective cohort study included 958 consecutive patients who underwent rACLR between 2003 and 2023 at a single high-volume sports medicine center. Patients were stratified by surgical period (before vs after October 2012) and by surgical strategy combining LEAP (anterolateral ligament reconstruction or modified Lemaire procedure) and contemporary posteromedial meniscal management. Since 2012, this consisted of systematic visualization of the posteromedial compartment and repair of medial meniscal posterior horn lesions using a posteromedial hook when indicated. Graft survival was analyzed using Kaplan–Meier methods with 10-year administrative censoring and compared with log-rank tests. Independent predictors of graft failure were assessed using multivariable Cox regression adjusted for age, sex, graft type, and surgical strategy. Results : At 10 years, the overall graft failure rate was 4.8% (95% CI, 3.5–6.5). Graft failure was significantly lower in patients treated after October 2012 compared with those treated earlier (3.9% vs 6.9%; log-rank p = 0.036). Graft survival differed significantly according to surgical strategy (log-rank p = 0.044). In multivariable analysis, surgical strategy remained independently associated with graft failure (p = 0.047). Isolated rACLR was associated with a threefold higher risk of graft failure compared with rACLR including LEAP and contemporary posteromedial meniscal management (HR 3.02; 95% CI, 1.22–8.17). Age =25 years at revision was also an independent predictor of graft failure (HR 2.83; 95% CI, 1.44–5.88). Among patients undergoing medial meniscal posterior horn repair, posteromedial hook repair was associated with lower rates of subsequent meniscectomy (p = 0.050). Conclusion: Graft survival after rACLR has significantly improved over the past two decades, largely driven by the adoption of combined lateral extra-articular procedures and systematic posteromedial meniscal assessment and repair rather than by surgical period alone. Younger age at revision remains an important risk factor for graft failure. Level of evidence: Level III.
 
       
08:21 - 08:26 Graft Choice in Primary ACL Reconstruction: Graft Failures, Patient-reported Measures and Functional Outcomes between Bone-Patellar-Tendon-Bone, Hamstring, and Quadriceps Tendon Autografts at Two-years Postoperative P. MacDonald1,2, S. Mcrae1, J. Leiter1,
 
    Peter B MacDonald, MD
 
   
Description
OBJECTIVES: This study compares failure rates, quality of life, and functional outcomes at two-years postoperatively between patients undergoing anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) using a bone-patellar tendon-bone (BPTB), semi-tendinosis-gracilis (STG), or quadriceps tendon (QT) autograft. METHODS: This was a prospective cohort study conducted at one centre with five fellowship trained knee surgeons. Eligible patients were consecutively enrolled and allocated to a graft group (BPTB, STG, QT) based on surgeon preference and expertise. All patients were >13 years old, skeletally mature and diagnosed with a complete unilateral ACL tear. Exclusion criteria included prior ACLR on either limb, partial tears not requiring reconstruction, concomitant ligament tear requiring surgical repair, severe chondromalacia, rheumatoid arthritis, Workers Compensation Board claim, or pregnancy at time of surgery. The primary outcome was graft failure defined as a pivot shift grade = 2 at any postoperative interval and/or surgeon documentation of ongoing instability or graft failure. Revision surgeries were also documented. Secondary outcomes included patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) including ACL QOL, SANE score, Marx Activity Rating Scale, Tegner Activity Score. Isokinetic strength testing was assessed using a dynamometer with concentric flexion and extension torques measured bilaterally. A Limb Symmetry Index (LSI) was calculated as a ratio (affected/unaffected) and expressed as a percentage. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize demographics. One-way ANOVA and chi-square tests were used to compare continuous and categorical variables respectively, with significance set at p<0.05. RESULTS: A total of 308 patients were enrolled (106 BPTB, 100 STG, 102 QT) with 271 (86%) completing two-year follow-up (90 BPTB, 88 STG, 93 QT). Baseline demographics, PROMS and functional outcomes at baseline and two-years postoperative are summarized in Table 1. The QT group was statistically younger (mean age 25.0±7.9years) than the BPTB (28.2±8.4) and STG (29.3±9.0) groups (p <0.001), and the proportion of males and females was approximately 50% for all groups (p=0.949). Graft failures in the BPTB, STG and QT groups were 1, 3, and 11 patients, respectively (p=0.006). Five revisions were documented with details in Table 2. PROMs did not differ between groups at baseline or postoperatively. With respect to strength, the baseline LSIs for both knee flexion and extension were comparable across groups, however, at two-years postoperative, the QT group demonstrated superior flexion strength recovery (LSI: 101%), while BPTB and STG groups demonstrated better extension recovery (LSI: 86% and 87% vs. 77% for QT; p=0.002). CONCLUSIONS: At two-years postoperative, the QT group experienced a higher number of graft failures compared to the BPTB and STG groups. All revision surgeries, regardless of graft type, were performed in patients <24 years of age, further supporting the association between younger age and increased risk of graft failure. As the QT cohort was significantly younger, this may have contributed to the increased failure rate, independent of graft type. No significant differences were observed between groups in quality of life or activity level however graft type was associated with different strength recovery profiles. QT grafts demonstrated superior flexion symmetry and BPTB/STG showed better extension symmetry at two-years postoperative. As a Level II prospective cohort study, potential confounding and surgeon bias may reduce internal validity compared to randomized trials; however the results demonstrate strong generalizability and accurately represent real-world clinical practice. Additional analyses are underway to further elucidate factors associated with graft outcomes, including a more detailed characterization of graft failure types such as re-rupture versus re-injury. Table 1. Demographics and outcomes for BPTB, STG and QT groups. BPTB STG QT p-value Age (yrs) 28.2 (8.4) 29.4 (9.0) 25.0 (7.9) <0.001* Sex (M/F) 53/53 50/50 49/53 0.949 ACL QOL (%) • Baseline 35.6 (15.1) 34.1 (14.5) 37.0 (14.3) 0.358 • 2 years PO 79.7 (16.4) 75.7 (18.1) 78.4 (17.4) 0.435 SANE (%) • Baseline 48.5 (22.7) 47.7 (24.5) 51.7 (23.6) 0.454 • 2 years PO 87.6 (10.3) 83.8 (17.9) 85.9 (10.9) 0.210 Marx Activity (/16) • Baseline 5.1 (5.2) 6.0 (5.5) 4.4 (5.3) 0.103 • 2 years PO 7.3 (4.5) 7.3 (5.3) 7.4 (4.8) 0.976 Tegner Activity (/10) • Baseline 7.8 (1.6) 7.3 (1.9) 7.9 (1.5) 0.063 • 2 years PO 6.3 (1.8) 5.9 (1.9) 5.9 (1.9) 0.323 Flexion torque (% - affected/unaffected) • Baseline 82.6 (19.9) 81.7 (22.0) 82.0 (24.0) 0.963 • 2 years PO 94.0 (14.5) 89.0 (13.3) 101.4 (13.7) <0.001* Extension torque (% - affected/unaffected) • Baseline 70.6 (19.4) 71.4 (23.0) 71.2 (24.1) 0.097 • 2 years PO 86.3 (17.9) 87.4 (18.6) 77.6 (16.1) 0.002* * Significance level <0.05; Significant difference between groups based on 1-way ANOVA Table 2: Revision surgeries. Grp Age Sex Beighton Score BMI Play Contact Sport? Time to Failure Mechanism of Re-Injury Revision Surgery (timing and procedures) STG 18 M 0 22 No 18m Soccer @24m: two-stage revision - bone grafting, then BPTB and lateral meniscal repair QT 17 M 4 20.1 Yes 3m Fall @27m: revision BPTB + LET QT 17 M 0 22.6 Yes 20m Basketball @26m: revision with BPTB QT 14 M 3 18.3 No 7m Fall @40m: revision with BPTB + LET, lateral meniscal repair, and medial partial meniscectomy QT 23 F 0 21.1 No 10m Grand mal seizure @28m: revision with BPTB + LET LET = lateral extraarticular tenodesis
 
       
08:27 - 08:32 Does High Intensity Activity Potentiate Development of Osteoarthritis After ACLR?
 
    Constance R Chu, MD
 
   
Description
INTRODUCTION: Return to high demand sports is a priority for many anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) patients. Relationships between However, participation in intense physical activity within 3 years of ACLR has previously been linked to increased cartilage degeneration, and thus increased risk of knee osteoarthritis (OA).1 While bone shape changes are hallmark features of osteoarthritis (OA),2-4 recent work shows OA-like bone shape changes following ACLR as well.5-7 The degree to which intense physical activity may influenceand bone shape changes PTOA after ACLR are not well understoodfollowing ACLR has not been widely examined. Employing novel artificial intelligence methods to quantify 3-D MRI bone shape, this study was performed to determine whetherThis study seeks to determine if and how physical activity [amount? Intensity?] in the first 2 years after ACLR impacts bone shape change. We hypothesize that patients who engaginge in more intense activity after ACLR will show more OA-like bone shape changes in the firsts 2 years following after ACLR. METHODS: Thirty-eight patients (ages 28± 7, 17 females) with unilateral ACLR and 10 uninjured volunteers (ages 28±4, 7 females) consented to participate in these IRB-approved studies, Table 1. ACLR participants underwent 3T MRI (GE, Healthcare) of the reconstructed knee at 6-weeks, 1-year and 2-years after surgery. Uninjured volunteers were scanned twice with ~1 week between scans. To quantitate bone shape, femurs from each participant at each timepoint were automatically segmented from a 3-D double-echo steady state (DESS) sequence (TR/TEs: 21/6.7, 34.8ms; flip angle 20°, 0.42x0.42mm resolution; 1.5mm slice thickness) and scores representing femur bone shape (B-score) were calculated using a neural shape model (NSM) trained on 9,376 baseline DESS images from the OAI dataset.8 Briefly, higher B-score indicates more OA-like shape features; 1 unit of B-score is equivalent to the standard deviation of healthy shapes. ACLR patients also completed Marx9 surveys at each timepoint to assess participation in activities that include running, cutting, deceleration and pivoting where the instructions state: “Please indicate how often you performed each activity in your healthiest and most active state, in the past year.” Statistics: Data sets were assessed for normality. NSM B-score smallest detectable difference (SDD) was estimated from Bland-Altman (BA) analysis of volunteers’ test-retest scans. Repeated measures and post-hoc paired t-tests (or their non-parametric equivalents) with adjustments for multiple comparisons assessed longitudinal changes in NSM B-score and Marx scores. Multivariable linear regression assessed relationships between Marx scores and NSB B-scores. The ability for activity level to predict shape change was determined from receiver operating curve (ROC) analysis and Youden’s Index. Statistical analyses were performed with SPSS(IBM); p<0.05 was accepted as significant. RESULTS: The SDD of NSM B-score, estimated from test-retest scans in uninjured volunteers, was 0.48, Figure 1. NSM Bone shape -scores progressively increased (more OA-like) from 6-weeks to 1-year and 2-year follow-ups in the 34 ACLR patients with MRI suitable for bone shape scoring at all timepoints, Figure 2. Individually, nearly half (15/34, 44%) of ACLR patients demonstrated NSM B-score increases between 6-weeks and 2-years exceeding the SDD. Mean Marx scoresx surveys showed significant indecreaseds from 6-weeks scores to 1-year follow-ups and then stabilized through 2-year follow-ups and then stabilized, Figure 2. Across individuals, Marx responses were highly variable. Between the 1- and 2-year follow-ups, 12/38 (32%) patients reported activity increases >2pts (the assumed clinically significant threshold10) and 7/38(18%) reported activity decreases <-2pts. Higher Marx scores at 2-years post-ACLR significantly correlated with greater (more OA-like) NSM B-scores also measured at 2-years (RS=0.439, p<0.007), Figure 3a. MThe relationship remained significant in multivariable modeling with parameter estimate (95%CI) suggestinshowedg that for each 1pt increase in Marx score, (~1 additional bout of intense exercise per week) NSM B-score increases by 0.09(0.03,0.14), p=0.003. Youden’s Index identified a Marx score cut-off of 8 points as predictive of B-score change toward more OA-like shape features between 6-weeks and 2-years post-ACLR, Figure 3b. DISCUSSION: More than 30 years ago, Daniel et al. expressed concern that ACLR may potentiate OA by stabilizing a vulnerable knee to engage in higher levels of activity.11 This work supports that concern as higher NSM B-scores, indicating more OA-like bone shapes, were detected in patients who reported engaging in high intensity sports within 2 years of ACLR. This data shows that achieving a Notably, Marx score of 8 or higher , corresponding to intense activity (e.g., soccer)cutting sports once or more times per week, was a reasonable predictor ofpredicted more more OA-like bone shape development changes following ACLR. A previous study using statistical shape modeling (SSM) found greater interlimb B-score differences associated with taller height, medial meniscus tear and decreasing age,12 but comparisons with physical activity proved inconclusive. NSM B-scores out-perform traditional shape modeling approaches (e.g., SSM) by capturing non-linear bone shape changes8,13 detecting femoral shape changes as early as 3 months after ACLR.14 SIGNIFICANCE: This study suggests that frequently engaging in high intensity physical activities within the first 2 years following ACLR may potentiatehave negative consequences for bone shape remodeling leading to development of OA-like bone shape features.
 
       
08:33 - 08:38 Hormonal Modulation and Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury in Athletes: Practical Evidence-Based Strategies for Risk Mitigation
 
    Robin West, MD
 
   
Description
This is currently an active project. We should have the date ready to present at the meeting. Systematic review of current evidence regarding the impact of hormonal modulation on noncontact ACL injury risk in female athletes, with the aim of informing evidence-based prevention and risk mitigation strategies. Evidence for this systematic review is being identified through a comprehensive search of electronic databases including PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library, using predefined search terms and strategies tailored to the research question. The review process follows the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, with explicit eligibility criteria for study selection and independent screening by multiple reviewers to minimize bias. Additional sources such as reference lists of relevant articles and manual searches of high-impact journals are being used to ensure completeness of evidence identification.
 
       
08:39 - 08:44 Changes in coronal plane alignment after transphyseal ACL reconstruction performed within 2 years of skeletal maturity: results from the PLUTO study group
 
    Mininder S Kocher, MD, MPH
 
   
Description
Abstract Background For patients with open physes approaching skeletal maturity, transphyseal anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction (ACLR) with soft tissue autograft is often the technique of choice. While considered low risk for iatrogenic physeal injury, growth disturbances have been reported. This study sought to evaluate post-operative changes in lower extremity coronal plane alignment 1-year after transphyseal ACLR in skeletally immature patients with limited growth remaining. Methods This was a prospective multicenter study of skeletally immature patients with =2 years of remaining growth who underwent a primary transphyseal, all soft-tissue autograft ACLR. All patients had documented skeletal age within 3 months of surgery. The change in the difference in alignment parameters between involved/uninvolved extremities from pre- to 1-year post-operative was calculated (difference of differences = ?2) to account for naturally occurring alignment changes. Radiographic measurements assessed included: mechanical axis deviation (MAD), anatomic lateral distal femoral angle (aLDFA), mechanical medial proximal tibial angle (mMPTA), posterior tibial slope (PTS), and leg length discrepancy (LLD). Results A total of 91 patients (48 males) met inclusion criteria with median chronological and skeletal ages of 13.9 years (IQR 13.2-14.6) and 14.0 years (IQR 13.0-15.0), respectively. Reconstructions were performed with hamstrings (46%) or quadriceps (54%) autograft. The median ?2 values in MAD (2.9mm, IQR -1.1 to 9.0), aLDFA (-1°, IQR -3 to 2), mMPTA (0°, IQR -1 to 3), and LLD (0.1cm, IQR -0.4 to 0.7) were small for each measure. However, 29% of patients demonstrated a =10mm ?2 in mechanical axis, and the ?2 for aLDFA and mMPTA was =5° in 17% and 16% of patients, respectively. No patient developed growth-related complications requiring intervention. Conclusion This study of skeletally immature individuals undergoing transphyseal ACLR with =2 years of remaining growth demonstrated small changes in coronal plane alignment 1-year post-operatively that did not require further intervention. However, a meaningful subset (16-30%) of patients demonstrated clinically relevant changes in alignment parameters. Routine pre-operative and post-operative radiographic surveillance is therefore warranted until skeletal maturity.
 
       
08:45 - 08:50 Anatomic, Isometric ACL Reconstruction: Technique and Results from the American Sports Medicine Institute
 
    Lyle Cain, MD
 
   
Description
ASMI surgeons, including Herodicus members Jim Andrews, Lyle Cain & Jeff Dugas have collected prospective outcomes data on anatomic, high femoral tunnel, isometric ACL reconstruction without additional extra-articluar procedures (LET, ALL) in athletes. This lecture will outline the surgical technique and outcomes from a high-volume center.
 
       
08:51 - 09:04 Discussion
 
 
       
09:05 - 09:44

Case Presentations 2: Optimizing Return to Play: Cutting Edge Cases to Change Your Practice – From the Professional Athlete to the Rising Star

The Social (General Session)

    Rachel M Frank, MD
Panelist: Brian J Cole, MD
Panelist: John D Kelly IV, MD
Panelist: Christopher M Larson, MD
Panelist: Bruce Levy, MD
   
09:05 - 09:44 Case Presentations
Optimizing Return to Play: Cutting Edge Cases to Change Your Practice – From the Professional Athlete to the Rising Star
 
    Rachel M Frank, MD
 
    Panelist: Brian J Cole, MD
 
    Panelist: John D Kelly IV, MD
 
    Panelist: Christopher M Larson, MD
 
    Panelist: Bruce Levy, MD
 
 
       
09:45 - 09:59
Break
The Social Lawn
10:00 - 10:44

Paper Session 2: Knee – Ligaments Part II

The Social (General Session)

    Moderator: Bernard R Bach, Jr., MD
Moderator: Sherwin SW Ho, MD
   
10:00 - 10:05 The MCL revisited – an ongoing journey to better understand anatomy, biomechanics, injury patterns and treatment
 
    Christian Fink, MD, Prof.
 
   
Description
The medial collateral ligament (MCL) complex is the primary static stabilizer of the medial side of the knee joint and plays a crucial role in resisting valgus stress, rotational forces, and anterior tibial translation. Injuries to the medial ligamentous complex are among the most common knee ligament injuries. While the majority can be managed conservatively with favorable clinical outcomes, surgical reconstruction is indicated in cases of significant instability, chronic insufficiency, or multiligamentous injury patterns. Persistent medial laxity increases the load on the cruciate ligaments and may contribute to early graft failure following cruciate ligament reconstruction. Biomechanical studies have demonstrated that the superficial MCL (sMCL) is the primary restraint to valgus rotation and a key stabilizer against external tibial rotation, particularly in deeper degrees of knee flexion. In contrast, the posterior oblique ligament (POL) is a major restraint to internal tibial rotation and valgus rotation in full knee extension. More recent studies emphasize the importance of the deep MCL (dMCL) in controlling external tibial rotation. Notably, the anterior portion of the dMCL appears functionally analogous to the anterolateral ligament (ALL) on the lateral side of the knee, suggesting the presence of a potential “anteromedial ligament (AML).” As a result, a wide spectrum of medial-sided injury patterns involving the dMCL, sMCL, and POL can be observed, often with a significant rotational component. Over the past several years, we have collaborated with multiple research groups across Europe to investigate the anatomy and biomechanics of the medial knee, as well as to develop and evaluate novel surgical reconstruction techniques, including MCL reconstruction using flat ligament constructs. Furthermore, we propose a new classification system for medial knee injuries that incorporates rotational instability in addition to traditional valgus laxity grading. This presentation will summarize these collective efforts alongside recent findings and ongoing research projects.
 
       
10:06 - 10:11 Does a Concomitant LET Impact Functional and Two Year Outcomes Following ACL Reconstruction?
 
    Walt R Lowe, MD
 
   
Description
A comparison of functional testing and two-year outcomes between patients who underwent ACL reconstruction with LET vs those who underwent ACL reconstruction without LET. Further sub-analyses would include comparisons within QT and PT autograft patients. Though the LET literature continues to rapidly expand, less is known about the impact of the LET on functional performance (hop testing, strength, etc.). This talk would seek to present our functional data and then facilitate discussion on the utilization/impact of the LET in athletes.
 
       
10:12 - 10:17 Recovery Trajectories of Isokinetic Peak Torque and Limb Symmetry After ACL Reconstruction With and Without Lateral Extra-Articular Tenodesis
 
    Geoffrey S Baer, MD, PhD
 
   
Description
Title: Recovery Trajectories of Isokinetic Peak Torque and Limb Symmetry After ACL Reconstruction With and Without Lateral Extra-Articular Tenodesis Geoffrey S. Baer, Molly Day, Tamara Scerpella, Collin Nguyen, Molly Grace, David Chen Introduction: Lateral extra-articular tenodesis (LET) is an increasingly performed adjunct procedure to anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) to improve stability in high-risk patients. While functional and clinical stability outcomes have been studied, there is little data available on the impact of concomitant LET procedure on postoperative recovery of quadriceps and hamstring isokinetic strength, an important determinant of return-to-sport readiness. Objective: The purpose of the current study was to compare isokinetic quadriceps and hamstring peak torque and limb symmetry indices (LSI) during the first post-operative year after ACLR with LET vs without LET. Methods: A retrospective review of all consecutive patients undergoing ACLR was performed from September 2018 to September 2025. Patients were included if they had at least two isokinetic post-operative assessments and were then stratified by the presence of concomitant LET (ACLR + LET) vs isolated ACLR. Isokinetic testing assessments were performed as a part of institutional protocol at set intervals. Our primary outcomes were quadriceps and hamstring peak torque and LSIs, which were calculated using the uninvolved limb as the reference standard (involved torque/uninvolved torque x 100). Differences between groups were assessed using mixed-effects models with fixed effects for the presence of LET, time, and group-by-time interactions, while adjusting for relevant covariates (age, sex, and graft). Results: There were 92 patients (25%) in the LET cohort and 282 patients (75%) in the isolated ACL cohort. Compared with isolated ACLR, the ACLR+LET cohort had a more favorable quadriceps strength trajectory, with a significant group-by-time interaction for quadriceps peak torque (p=0.023). At 12 months, when compared to isolated ACLR, the ACLR+LET cohort demonstrated higher adjusted estimates of quadriceps peak torque (+0.038 ft-lbs/lb ± 0.18, p=0.038), representing a 4.8% difference, with no significant difference at earlier time points. Both cohorts exhibited comparable rates of quadriceps LSI gain. LET was associated with greater adjusted estimates of quadriceps LSI at 10 months (+3.2%, p=0.039) and 12 months (+3.6%, p=0.033) postoperatively. There was no significant difference in hamstring peak torque or LSI between groups. Conclusion: ACLR with concurrent LET was associated with similar or improved strength recovery outcomes up to one year postoperative. These findings suggest the addition of LET to ACLR does not hinder strength recovery patterns and rehabilitation in the early post-operative period.
 
       
10:18 - 10:23 Does adding a LET reduce the failure rate and improve outcomes in ACLR Findings from the NZ ACL Registry
 
    Mark G Clatworthy, MD
 
   
Description
Results of Isolated BPB, Quads and Hamstring ACL Reconstruction vs Combined ACL Reconstruction with a Lateral Extra-Articular Procedure from the New Zealand ACL Registry Mark Clatworthy Richard Rahardja, Simon W. Young ABSTRACT Introduction: The addition of a lateral extra-articular procedure (LEAP) in primary anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) has increased to address rotational instability. Orthopaedic registries have made significant contributions to the improvement of patient outcomes through their ability to detect inferior results associated with specific surgical techniques. The aim of this study was to present the early results of combined ACL reconstruction with a LEAP from the New Zealand ACL Registry. Methods: Prospective data recorded in the New Zealand ACL Registry were analyzed. Primary ACLR performed between May 2014 and June 2025 were included, allowing for a minimum follow-up of 1-year. Procedures using bone-patellar tendon-bone (BTB), quads tendon or hamstring tendon autografts were analyzed. The primary outcome was revision ACLR. The revision rate was also analyzed in patients 16-25 and 26 and older. Secondary outcomes included the Marx activity score and the Knee Injury Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS). Analysis was stratified by graft type and compared between isolated ACLR (iACLR) versus ACLR with a LEAP (ACLR+LEAP). Statistical analysis was performed through a Chi-square test for binary outcomes and Mann-Whitney U test for continuous outcomes. Results: A total of 20329 primary ACLR were analyzed in which 1263 had a LEAP. In the BTB cohort (n = 6442), 5812 underwent ACLR and 630 underwent ACLR+LEAP. There were 3 revisions in the ACLR+LEAP patients with a BTB autograft (0.4%), compared to 630 revisions in patients who underwent BPB graft only ACLR (2.4%, p = 0.038). In the hamstring cohort (n = 12776), 12231 underwent iACLR and 545 underwent ACLR+LEAP. Four patients with ACLR+LEAP with a hamstring tendon autograft underwent a revision (0.7%) compared to 541 patients with a hamstring tendon autograft (4.8%, p = 0.020). In the quads tendon cohort (n = 1111), 1023 underwent iACLR and 88 underwent ACLR+LEAP. One patient with an ACLR+LEAP underwent a revision (1.1%) compared to 19 patients with a quads tendon autograft (1.9%, p = 0.845). With all grafts + LEAP patients over 25 had no failures. Patients aged 16-25 with a LEAP had a lower failure rate with all graft types (Fig 1) In the BTB quads and hamstring cohorts, similar Marx activity (p>0.05),and KOOS scores (p>0.05), were reported at 2-year follow-up when comparing ACLR and ACLR+LEAP. Discussion and Conclusion: Early data demonstrates a lower revision rate when ACLR using either BTB, quads or hamstring autograft is combined with a LEAP. Patients 16-25 showed a greater difference in the failure rate. Similar PROM scores were reported at 2-year follow-up between iACLR and ACLR+LEAP. Summary: Early results from the New Zealand ACL Registry demonstrates lower revision rates when performing ACL reconstruction with a lateral extra-articular procedure.
 
       
10:24 - 10:29 What is my ACLR Retear Rate?
 
    Christopher C Kaeding, MD
 
   
Description
Define the context of retear outcomes.
 
       
10:30 - 10:44 Discussion
 
 
       
10:45 - 11:04

Symposium 1: The ACL + (plus): LET it ALL Be Part of Your Algorithm – But Does an LET / ALL Truly Make a Difference?

The Social (General Session)

    Alan Getgood, MD MPhil FRCS(Tr&Orth)
Panelist: John-Paul H Rue, MD
Panelist: K Donald Shelbourne, MD
Panelist: Kurt P Spindler, MD
Panelist: Armando F Vidal, MD
   
11:05 - 11:49

Paper Session 3: Knee – Meniscus Tears in 2026

The Social (General Session)

    Moderator: Brian Robert Waterman, MD
Moderator: Brian R Wolf, MD, MS
   
11:05 - 11:10 Direct Suture Anchor Fixation Versus Transtibial Pull-Through Repair for Meniscus Root Tears
 
    Aaron J Krych, MD
 
   
Description
Purpose: The purpose of this study was to compare short-term outcomes of direct suture anchor fixation versus transtibial pull-through repair for meniscus root tears. Methods: Fifty patients that underwent direct suture anchor fixation were propensity matched to 100 transtibial repairs by age, sex, body mass index, operative side, root laterality, and concomitant procedures. Baseline radiographic characteristics (coronal alignment and posterior tibial slope) were measured. Outcomes included Lysholm, International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC), Tegner, Visual Analog Scale (VAS) pain, satisfaction, radiographic parameters (Kellgren-Lawrence grade), and complications/reoperations. Results: Mean age was 44 ± 18 years in the direct suture anchor group and 41 ± 14 years in the transtibial group (p = 0.14). Mean follow-up for the overall cohort was 4.4 years. Reoperation rates were 8% with direct suture anchor and 14% with transtibial repair (p = 0.43). Direct suture anchor patients reported lower VAS pain at rest (0.7 vs 1.2, p = 0.048) and with activity (1.8 vs 2.5, p = 0.02). Lysholm and IKDC scores improved in both groups without significant differences, with Lysholm scores averaging 87 ± 17 for direct suture anchor versus 83 ± 15 for transtibial pull-through (p = 0.05) and IKDC scores averaging 79 ± 22 versus 76 ± 17, respectively (p = 0.09). Change in Kellgren-Lawrence grade from preoperative to postoperative was greater in the transtibial group compared with the direct suture anchor group, though this difference did not reach statistical significance (0.6 vs 0.3, p = 0.07). Conclusion: Patients treated with direct suture anchor fixation reported less pain at rest and with activity, with trends toward superior functional scores and less radiographic progression. These findings suggest that direct suture anchor fixation may provide early clinical advantages compared with transtibial repair, though longer-term follow-up is needed to confirm durability of outcomes.
 
       
11:11 - 11:16 Meniscal Allograft Survivorship 25 Years After Implantation
 
    Thomas R Carter, MD
 
   
Description
Meniscal Allograft Survivorship 25 Years After Implantation Thomas Carter MD Purpose: To evaluate meniscal allograft survivorship 25 years after implantation. Methods: The author’s initial fifty-six meniscal allograft patients at a minimum 25 years following implantation comprised the study group. Forty-eight (85.7%) were found regarding any additional surgeries. Results: Of the 48 patients, 34 required additional surgeries. Fourteen had isolated meniscectomy, one had repair of the meniscus allograft, and 19 had knee arthroplasty. Of the arthroplasty patients, two had prior HTO and 9 prior meniscectomies. Thus 14 had no additional surgery for a graft survivorship of 29.2%. Only 2 patients said they would not have the surgery again. Conclusions: Meniscal allografts were able to provide subjective benefit with survivorship of 29.2% at 25 years after implantation.
 
       
11:17 - 11:22 Predictors and Risk of Reoperation Following Horizontal Cleavage Meniscus Tear Repair
 
    David C Flanigan, MD
 
   
Description
OBJECTIVE: Horizontal cleavage meniscus tears (HCT) are increasingly managed with repair as it is believed to preserve knee function and limit degenerative changes compared to meniscectomy. Despite the growing frequency of repair, the published data on the risk of failure following HCT repair remain limited. This study aims to quantify failure following HCT repair and evaluate demographic and clinical factors that may be associated with an increased risk of reoperation. METHODS: Retrospective chart review identified 153 HCT repairs performed at a single academic center between 2011 and 2022. Failure was defined as repeat surgery on the index meniscus. Potential predictors of failure were age, sex, BMI, medial vs lateral meniscus tear, coronal plane knee alignment, smoking status (non-smoker vs smoker), presence of associated cartilage defects, and previous knee surgery. RESULTS: The cohort included 93 men and 60 women with an average age of 32.1 ± 13.2 years and BMI of 28.2 ± 5.8 kg/m². Mean follow-up was 1.6 years. Among the cohort, 72 patients (47.1%) had a medial tear, 60 patients (39.2%) had a lateral tear, and 21 patients (13.7%) had tears of both menisci. Fifteen patients (9.8%) underwent re-operation on the index meniscus during the follow-up period, including revision repair, subsequent meniscectomy, or total knee arthroplasty (TKA). No potential predictors were associated with failure including age (p = 0.71), sex (p = 0.58), BMI (p = 0.76), smoking status (p = 0.13), cartilage defect grade (p = 0.73), medial vs lateral meniscus tear (p = 1.00), previous knee surgery (p = 0.58), and coronal plane alignment in either medial (p = 0.09) or lateral (p = 0.59) repairs. CONCLUSIONS: Repair of HCT is associated with a low failure risk as defined by repeat surgery at short-term follow-up. Age, sex, BMI, smoking status, prior knee surgery, cartilage status, and varus/valgus angulation were not associated with repeat meniscus surgery.
 
       
11:23 - 11:28 Complete Radial Mid-body and Root Variant (type 4) Lateral Meniscus Tears: Epidemiology and Repair Outcomes in Athletes
 
    Christopher M Larson, MD
 
   
Description
Background: Complete radial lateral meniscal tears have detrimental effects on lateral joint reactive forces with the potential for rapid chondral wear when left untreated or undergoing partial meniscectomy. There has been increased focus on repair techniques for these complete radial tears but outcomes following complete radial tear repairs are still limited in particular for athletes. Methods: We repaired 37 complete radial mid-body lateral meniscal tears and 76 complete radial root-variant (Type 4) tears. The number of males / females were 28/9 in the mid-body repair group and 43/33 in the root variant group. We evaluated the specific sport and level of sport for athletes, return to sports rate, and outcomes pre and post-operatively with Lysholm, Cincinnati, and IKDC scoring. We also evaluated each group for repair technique, subsequent reoperations and meniscus status (healed, partial failure, complete failure) at the time of second look arthroscopy when performed. Results: The mean age was 22 years for all mid-body tears and 23 years for all root-variant tears. All root-variants tears had a concomitant ACL tear and underwent ACLR and all were repaired with a side to side all inside technique. 16 mid-body tears were isolated repairs with a mean age 19.9 years and male/female #’s of 15/1. 21 mid-body tears had a concomitant ACL tear and underwent ACLR with a mean age of 23.7 and male/female #’s of 13/8. 25 mid-body repairs underwent inside out repair and 12 had an all inside technique. The level of sport in the mid-body group was 6 professional, 6 collegiate, 17 high school, and the remainder being recreational level. The most common sport involved at the time of injury in the mid-body group was football (57%), and soccer (32%). The level of sport for the root-variant group was 2 professional, 17 collegiate, 32 high school, and remainder being recreational level. The most common sport involved at the time of injury in the root-variant group was soccer (36%), football (32%), and basketball (26%). At second look arthroscopy primarily for adhesions, mid-body tears were completely healed (60%), peripherally healed (40%), and root variant repairs were completely healed (78%), peripherally healed (22%). There were no complete failures at second look. Lysholm, Cincinnati, and IKDC improved postoperatively in all groups. Latest follow-up scores were 86, 82, 79 (LFU mean = 23.7m) for all mid-body repairs, 92,88,82 (LFU mean = 22.2m) for isolated mid-body repairs, and 87,77,77 (LFU mean = 22.1m) for root-variant repairs. Conclusions: Complete radial mid-body and root variant lateral meniscal repairs lead to improved postoperative outcomes, return to sport for most athletes, and healing for the majority of tears at second look arthroscopy when performed. Complete radial mid-body lateral meniscal tears were more common in males and in particular isolated mid-body tears (no ACL) were largely younger male football players. Repair should be considered for the short and long term health of the knee despite increased recovery times for isolated midbody tears. Christopher M Larson, Corey A Wulf, Kayla Seiffert, Rebecca Stone McGaver Twin Cities Orthopedics, Edina, MN
 
       
11:29 - 11:34 A Meniscus Repair Risk Score Predicts High Rate of Revision Surgery after All-Inside Meniscus Repair
 
    Volker Musahl, MD
 
   
Description
Purpose: The primary purpose of this study was to identify the revision rate and predictors of revision surgery following all-inside meniscus repair. The secondary purpose was to create a risk assessment tool to predict revision surgery after all-inside meniscus repair. Methods: All patients age 14-40 years old who underwent all-inside meniscus repair by 1 of 6 high-volume surgeons from 2016-2022 were retrospectively reviewed. Exclusion criteria included prior ipsilateral knee surgery, concomitant procedures other than anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR), meniscus root repairs, discoid menisci, inside-out or outside-in meniscus repair, and <2 year clinical follow-up. Variables collected included demographics, sport type (pivoting, squatting, other), sport level (organized vs recreational), mechanism of injury (twisting vs non-twisting), tear characteristics (laterality, pattern, size, location), number of all-inside sutures, concomitant ACLR, and use of fibrin clot. The primary outcome was revision surgery on the same meniscus. Multivariate regression identified predictors of revision surgery, and hazard ratio (HR) estimates were used to create a risk assessment tool and correlated with patient-specific risk via postestimation analysis. Significance was set to p<0.05. Results: A total of 123 meniscus repairs (82 medial, 41 lateral) from 115 patients (mean age: 22 years, 66% males) were included at mean follow-up of 4±2 years. The overall revision rate was 32%, with a higher revision rate noted among medial versus lateral meniscus repairs (38% vs 20%; p=0.041). Age <25 years (HR: 6.7, p=0.012), twisting injury mechanism (HR: 2.0, p=0.046), squatting sport type (HR: 4.0, p=0.01), complex tear pattern (HR: 3.0, p=0.018), tears spanning 2+ regions (HR: 9.1, p=0.024), and medial meniscus repairs (HR: 2.2, p=0.028) were independent risk factors for revision surgery on multivariable regression, and were used for creation of a risk score to predict revision surgery (Table 1). The risk score was found to be a significant predictor of revision surgery (OR: 1.38, 95% CI: 1.17-1.68, p<0.001), with patients in the highest quartile (risk score >14) sustaining a 61% revision rate compared to a 13% revision rate identified in the lowest quartile (risk score <8) (Table 2). Conclusion: A high revision rate of 32% was identified following all-inside meniscus repair of traumatic meniscus tears. The use of a risk score to predict revision surgery after all-inside meniscus repair may help guide surgeons during surgical planning, especially when identifying the most appropriate meniscus repair technique to optimize clinical outcomes on an individualized patient-specific basis.
 
       
11:35 - 11:49 Discussion
 
 
       
11:50 - 12:29

Symposium 2: Sports Team Coverage: Lessons Learned About Liability and Legal Implications – What Have the Philadelphia Eagles Taught Us?

The Social (General Session)

    Matthew T. Provencher, MD, MBA
Panelist: Frederick M Azar, MD
Panelist: James P Bradley, MD
Panelist: John E Conway, MD
Panelist: Neal ElAttrache, MD
Panelist: Walt R Lowe, MD
   
12:30 - 12:39
Break to Excuse Non-Members (Members pick up lunch)
The Social Lawn
12:40 - 13:30

Business Meeting I (Members Only – Working Lunch)

The Social (General Session)

       
06:00 - 06:29
Working Breakfast (Breakfast Served)
The Social Lawn
06:30 - 07:19

Working Breakfast (ICCUS Symposia)

The Social (General Session)

06:30 - 06:54 Symposium 3: Why Hamstring Injuries Are The Quicksand of Return-to-Play in Collegiate and Professional Sports: How Do We Get Better?
 
   
Description
Moderator: Mike Reinold Panelists: Mal McHugh, Tim Tyler, Ashley Campbell
 
       
06:55 - 07:19 Symposium 4: Are We Really Doing A Good Job with Return-to-Play Testing after ACL Surgery?
 
   
Description
Moderator: Kevin Wilk Panelists: Mike Voight, Bob Mangine, Holly Silvers
 
       
07:20 - 07:29
Break
The Social Lawn
07:30 - 07:24

Welcome and Announcements

The Social (General Session)

    President: Walt R Lowe, MD
Chair: Matthew T. Provencher, MD, MBA
   
07:35 - 08:19

Paper Session 4: Shoulder Instability – Are We Getting Better?

The Social (General Session)

07:35 - 07:40 Posterior Bone Block Versus Arthroscopic Posterior Labral Repair for Primary Posterior Shoulder Instability Procedures
 
    Grant L Jones, MD
 
   
Description
Title: Posterior Bone Block Versus Arthroscopic Posterior Labral Repair for Primary Posterior Shoulder Instability Procedures Background: Posterior instability is more common than reported in the past, and posterior shoulder instability procedures are becoming more frequent. A majority of primary posterior instability procedures are arthroscopic labral repairs. However, subcritical posterior bone loss is being recognized with greater frequency; and, not addressing this surgically has been shown to lead to higher failure rates. Therefore, many surgeons now have a lower threshold for proceeding with a posterior bone block procedure. Purpose: The purpose of our study is to compare the results of arthroscopic posterior labral repair with posterior bone block procedures for primary posterior shoulder instability procedures performed at our institution. Methods/ Results: A retrospective medical record review was performed of all posterior shoulder instability procedures performed by four shoulder surgeons at The Ohio State University between 2012 and 2024 with at least 2 year-follow up. We identified 451 patients who underwent arthroscopic posterior labral repair. We then identified 18 patients who had undergone a posterior bone block procedure with 12 of these cases being the primary surgery and 6 being a revision surgery. We will report on the patient reported outcomes and failure rates (recurrent subluxation or dislocation and reoperation). We will evaluate the outcomes for any statistically significant differences between arthroscopic posterior labral repair patients and posterior bone block patients. We will also evaluate for the presence and measure the degree of pre-operative posterior glenoid bone in each group and compare the degree of bone loss between the groups.
 
       
07:41 - 07:46 Arthroscopic Posterior Distal Tibia Allograft Reconstruction for Glenohumeral Instability
 
    Jonathan Dickens, MD
 
   
Description
This presentation will present the outcomes of a retrospective series arthoscopic posterior DTA for complex posterior instability
 
       
07:47 - 07:52 Percutaneous labral repair and capsulorrhaphy performed via Nanoneedle
 
    Kyle Anderson, MD
 
   
Description
Nano arthroscopy has emerged as a tool to make shoulder surgery techniques minimally invasive. The available scientific literature evaluating nano arthroscopy has been focused on surgical visualization; however, dedicated tools and surgeon experience have progressed to surgical treatment of common sports medicine shoulder pathologies. This technical note describes an entirely percutaneous labral repair with capsulorrhaphy performed with nano arthroscopic visualization and accompanying instrumentation.
 
       
07:53 - 07:58 Influence of Chronicity, Number, and Type of Anterior Shoulder Instability Events on Hill-Sachs Lesion Size: A Morphometric Analysis of 255 Patients
 
    Albert Lin, MD
 
   
Description
Influence of Chronicity, Number, and Type of Anterior Shoulder Instability Events on Hill-Sachs Lesion Size: A Morphometric Analysis of 255 Patients Sahil Dadoo MD1, Ryan T. Lin BS2, Tyler C. Williams BS2, Ryan Gilbert BA2, Maite Jaspers MD3, Adam Popchak, DPT, PhD1; Bryson P. Lesniak, MD1, Mark Rodosky MD1, Jonathan D. Hughes, MD, PhD1, & Albert Lin MD1 1 University of Pittsburgh Medical Center Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Pittsburgh, PA, USA 2 University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA 3 UPMC Sports Surgery Clinic, Dublin, Ireland OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to evaluate factors associated with Hill-Sachs lesion (HSL) size at time of properties magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), including the chronicity, number, and type of prior anterior shoulder instability events. The hypothesis was that chronic instability, multiple prior instability events, and experiencing glenohumeral dislocation versus subluxation would result in larger HSL size at time of preoperative MRI. METHODS: A retrospective review was conducted on all patients undergoing arthroscopic Bankart repair (ABR) with or without remplissage for anterior shoulder instability between 2007-2023. Exclusion criteria included age <14 years, revision surgery, glenoid bone loss >20%, unknown date of instability, missing or unavailable MRI, and lack of HSL. Patients were characterized based on chronicity of anterior shoulder instability (acute =6 months versus chronic >6 months), experiencing one versus multiple prior anterior shoulder instability events, and experiencing glenohumeral subluxation (no manual reduction required) versus dislocation (manual reduction required). HSL medial-lateral width and cranio-caudal length were measured on axial and sagittal MRI respectively. HSL area (recorded in mm2) was calculated as HSL width times length. Imaging variables were compared between groups, and multivariable regression evaluated predictors of larger HSL area and smaller distance to dislocation (DTD). Significance was set to p<0.050. RESULTS: After applying exclusion criteria, 255 patients (age: 22±8 years; 24% female) were included, of which 153 patients had acute instability and 102 patients had chronic instability. There was no association between acute versus chronic instability and HSL width (11.6 vs 12.4 mm; p=0.196), HSL length (16.4 vs 16.7 mm; p=0.521), nor HSL area (201.6 vs 215.7 mm2; p=0.154). Patients who experienced dislocation versus subluxation were found to have larger HSL length (16.7 vs 13.4 mm; p<0.001) and HSL area (201.9 vs 150.7 mm2; p=0.012). Within-group analysis identified a smaller DTD in chronic versus acute dislocators (9.1 vs 10.9 mm; p=0.043), as well as a smaller DTD (9.0 vs 13.5 mm; p=0.005) and larger HSL width (12.3 vs 8.8 mm; p=0.009) in chronic versus acute subluxators. Female sex (B: -74.5; p=0.001) and glenohumeral dislocation (B: 49.5; p=0.037) were predictors of smaller and larger HSL area, respectively, whereas chronic anterior shoulder instability was a predictor of DTD <8mm (OR: 2.2; p=0.008). CONLUSION: Chronic anterior shoulder instability did not influence HSL size at time of preoperative MRI, but was found to be a predictor of DTD <8mm. Conversely, glenohumeral dislocation was a significant predictor of larger HSL area. This indicates that HSL size may be influenced more by type of instability event, whereas DTD may be more influenced by chronicity of anterior shoulder instability.
 
       
07:59 - 08:04 Latarjet outcomes of the MOON Shoulder Instability Cohort
 
    Brian R Wolf, MD, MS
 
   
Description
Two-year outcomes of 211 patients undergoing Latarjet for shoulder instability are reported. We have examined risk factors for outcomes including cannulated versus solid screw fixation, subscapularis tenotomy versus split, and Hill Sachs size as predictors for patient-reported PROs, repeat surgery, subluxation or dislocation.
 
       
08:05 - 08:19 Discussion
 
 
       
08:20 - 09:04

Case Presentations 3: Shoulder Injuries from the Sidelines to the Operating Room to Recovery - Tips and Pearls from Real Cases in 2025-2026 from the Experts

The Social (General Session)

    William N Levine, MD
Panelist: Robert H Brophy, MD
Panelist: Michael G Ciccotti, MD
Panelist: Peter J Millett, MD MSc
Panelist: Anthony A Romeo, MD
   
09:05 - 09:39

Symposium 5: Leadership in Orthopaedics: Update on Our Future in Orthopaedics and Sports Medicine

The Social (General Session)

    Moderator: Walt R Lowe, MD
Moderator: Matthew T. Provencher, MD, MBA
Moderator: Armando F Vidal, MD
   
09:05 - 09:09 AOSSM
 
    Eric C McCarty, MD
 
    Rick  W Wright, MD
 
 
       
09:10 - 09:14 AANA
 
    John D Kelly IV, MD
 
    John M Tokish, MD
 
   
Description
 
       
09:15 - 09:19 ASES
 
    John E Kuhn, MD
 
    Peter B MacDonald, MD
 
 
       
09:20 - 09:24 Healthcare Leadership Education: The Next Step
 
    Dean C Taylor, MD
 
   
Description
Discuss lessons learned in healthcare leadership education, and efforts to scale nationally.
 
       
09:25 - 09:29 AAOS Update: Political Action Advocacy and Liability
 
    Mininder S Kocher, MD, MPH
 
 
       
09:30 - 09:39 Discussion
 
 
       
09:40 - 10:29

Paper Session 5: Shoulder – Rotator Cuff / Biceps / The Other Stuff

The Social (General Session)

    Moderator: Cassandra Alda Lee, MD
Moderator: C. Benjamin Ma, MD
   
09:40 - 09:45 Acellular Human Dermal Allograft Augmentation for Rotator Cuff Repair: Our Experience Over the Past Decade
 
    Stephen F Brockmeier, MD
 
   
Description
This presentation will discuss the evolution of dermal allograft augmentation for rotator cuff repair and highlight our experience with this technique over the past decade with attention to indications, patient outcomes at our institution, and recent (and potential future) technique advances.
 
       
09:46 - 09:51 Biceps Augmentation of Massive Rotator Cuff Tears Without Tenotomy Yields Equivalent or Greater Improvements in Patient Reported Outcomes Than Comparable Repairs Without Biceps Augmentation
 
    Larry D Field, MD
 
   
Description
Introduction Biceps transposition used to augment massive rotator cuff repairs provides additional footprint coverage and increases structural integrity. The objective of this study is to compare the effectiveness of utilizing a previously published “Bio-SCR” biceps augmentation technique with a concurrent group of patients undergoing massive rotator cuff repair without biceps augmentation. Methods Patient reported outcomes (ASES), revision rates, and post-operative complications for consecutive patients undergoing repair of massive rotator cuff tears (> 20 cm2), either with biceps augmentation (n=72) or without augmentation (n=60), were evaluated. Results No statistical differences between groups were seen for rotator cuff tear size (Bio 33.6 cm2, Non 31.7 cm2, p=0.148) or patient age (Bio 66.1 yrs, Non 63.9 yrs, p=0.110). Significantly more patients receiving biceps augmentation underwent a partial repair than in the non-augmented group (Bio 43.5%, Non 22.7%, p=0.013). Biceps augmentation procedures utilized fewer average anchors per case (Bio 1.71 anchors, Non 2.47 anchors, p<0.001). ASES scores were collected pre-operatively, 2 weeks, 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years post-operatively. Follow-up means were Bio-SCR 2.31 years (0.5-6.7 years) and Non Bio-SCR 1.53 years (0.5-3.8 years). Patient reported outcomes were equivalent at all time periods except at 2 years post-operatively when ASES scores for the biceps augmented group significantly exceeded the Non Bio-SCR group (Bio 83.7, Non 71.1, p=0.014). Revision rates were equivalent between groups (Bio 2.4%, Non 3.0%, p=0.825). Active forward flexion was statistically equivalent between groups pre-operatively. The Bio-SCR cohort showed greater active forward flexion at four months post-operatively (p<0.001). Conclusion Patients undergoing Bio-SCR augmentation of massive rotator cuff repairs demonstrated equivalent or superior patient reported outcomes at all post-operative time periods despite undergoing a higher percentage of partial repairs. Biceps augmentation of massive tears utilizing this technique offers an effective alternative to arthroscopic techniques not utilizing biceps augmentation.
 
       
09:52 - 09:57 The Bridge is On Fire: Outcomes of Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty After Failed Rotator Cuff Surgery
 
    Nikhil N Verma, MD
 
   
Description
This presentation examines clinical outcomes following reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) in patients with prior failed rotator cuff–related procedures. We compared patient-reported outcomes, range of motion, and complication rates between patients undergoing RTSA after failed rotator cuff repair, superior capsular reconstruction, or tendon transfer versus patients undergoing primary RTSA for rotator cuff tear arthropathy. Those without prior ipsilateral shoulder surgery demonstrated significantly greater clinical outcomes with further analysis revealing that patients with failed SCR or tendon transfer experienced inferior outcomes compared to those with failed rotator cuff repair alone. This presentation will highlight the substantial impact of prior cuff salvage procedures on RTSA results and underscore the importance of counseling patients on the trade-offs between attempting reconstructive surgery versus proceeding directly to RTSA, particularly given the elevated complication risk and diminished functional benefit observed after failed SCR or tendon transfer.
 
       
09:58 - 10:03 Autograft Biceps "smash" for augmentation of rotator cuff repair
 
    John M Tokish, MD
 
   
Description
This talk will summarize the early results of rotator cuff repair augmentation using the autograft biceps with and without a polyester patch for the treatment of rotator cuff disease, and speak of other areas where this may be effective as an adjunct to healing
 
       
10:04 - 10:09 Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes of the Latarjet Procedure Using Bio-Integrative Screws: A Case Series
 
    Michael T Freehill, MD
 
   
Description
Background Anterior shoulder instability with critical glenoid bone loss remains a challenging problem in active patients. The Latarjet procedure reliably restores stability, but complications including hardware prominence, graft osteolysis, and secondary cartilage injury remain major concerns. Recent interest has highlighted alternative bony fixation devices such as cortical buttons, cerclage fixation, and bio-integrative screws. The purpose of this study was to assess the osseous healing and clinical efficacy of a Latarjet procedure performed with Bio-integrative screws. Methods A retrospective case series on prospectively collected patients who underwent open Latarjet procedure using OSSIOfiber compression screws (OSSIO Ltd, Caesarea, Israel) between 2023 and 2025 by a single surgeon was conducted. Pre- and 6-month post-operative outcomes included patient-reported measures (ASES, SSV, Constant), post-operative dislocation or subluxation events, and graft union evaluated by two independent musculoskeletal radiologists on Computed Tomography (CT) imaging. Union was defined by visible trabecular continuity across the graft–glenoid interface in >67% of the surface. Post-operative complications and return-to-sport timelines were also recorded. Results Thirteen patients (12 men, 1 woman; mean age 26.5 ± 8.5 years) were included. (Table 1). The mean osseous union percentage was 82.3% at six months. 12 of 13 shoulders (92.3%) achieved >67% osseous bridging, 8 of 13 (61.5%) achieved >80%, and 5 of 13 (38.5%) achieved >90%. (Table 2) Mean clinical scores improved significantly from pre- to post-operative assessment with ASES 71.6 to 91.6 (p = 0.005), Constant 77 to 87 (p = 0.009), and SSV 50% to 90% (p < 0.002). VAS pain decreased from 1 to 0 (p = 0.069). (Table 3) There were no graft fractures, hardware failures, recurrent instability episodes, or re-operations in the cohort. Conclusion The use of bio-integrative compression screws in the Latarjet procedure demonstrated promising early graft union reliability, absence of hardware complications, and strong clinical and stability outcomes at short-term follow-up. These findings suggest that bio-integrative screw fixation have the potential to provide stable fixation with the benefit of gradual osseous incorporation eliminating the need for permanent hardware. Larger comparative studies with longer term follow-up are warranted to validate these preliminary results.
 
       
10:10 - 10:15 Open Capsular Shift with Achilles Allograft Augmentation for Multidirectional Shoulder Instability: Long-Term Outcomes and Implications for Patients with Ehlers-Danlos Syndrome
 
    Scott Rodeo, MD
 
   
Description
I will present long-term outcomes on 9 patients with Ehlers Danlos syndrome and recurrent multi-directional shoulder instability treated with open capsular shift augmented with Achilles tendon allograft.
 
       
10:16 - 10:29 Discussion
 
 
       
10:30 - 10:44
Break
The Social Lawn
10:45 - 11:09

Herodicus Godparent Lecture

The Social (General Session)

    Moderator: Walt R Lowe, MD
   
10:45 - 11:04 “Herodicus Society…who are we and where are we going?”…a short walk down memory lane with a peek into what maybe the future of the society and Sports Medicine in general.
 
    Peter A Indelicato, MD
 
   
Description
Godfather presentation Herodicus Society…who are we and where are we going?”…a short walk down memory lane with a peek into what maybe the future of the society and Sports Medicine in general.
 
       
11:05 - 11:09 Discussion
 
 
       
11:10 - 11:21

Herodicus Traveling Fellows

The Social (General Session)

11:10 - 11:11 Introduction
 
    David C Flanigan, MD
 
    Peter B MacDonald, MD
 
 
       
11:12 - 11:16 Traveling Fellow Presentation
 
    Rehan Dawood
 
 
       
11:17 - 11:21 Traveling Fellow Presentation
 
    Tyler Uppstrom, MD
 
 
       
11:22 - 11:29

Herodicus Award at AOSSM (2025 recipient)

The Social (General Session)

11:22 - 11:23 Introduction
 
    Michael T Freehill, MD
 
 
       
11:24 - 11:29 The Sport Publication Observational Research Tool (SPORT): An Objective Tool to Score the Methodological Quality of Observational Clinical Sports Medicine Research
 
    Andrew W Kuhn, MD
 
 
       
11:30 - 12:14

Paper Session 6: Sports Medicine / Surgery is a Super Cool Profession

The Social (General Session)

    Moderator: Robert Litchfield, MD
Moderator: Bradley J Nelson, MD
   
11:30 - 11:35 The crisis in amateur sports.
 
    Richard H Rokos, PhD
 
   
Description
Analysis of a critical situation.
 
       
11:36 - 11:41 Golf Swing...Chasing Distance and Swing Faults that Result in Injuries
 
   
Description
Greg Rose (Founder of Titleist Performance Institute
 
       
11:42 - 11:47 Physician Therapist Relationships in Sports Medicine; Past History and Future Endeavors
 
   
Description
Mike Voight (Current president of ICCUS)
 
       
11:48 - 11:53 The History of Wine in Napa
 
    Marc R Safran, MD
 
   
Description
Give a history of Wine in Napa and its Rise to Prominence. Also a bit on the wine making process
 
       
11:54 - 11:59 Gambling in Sports: a History
 
    Edward R Mcdevitt, MD
 
   
Description
The lecture will explore the fascinating history of gambling in sports from the Ancient Greek games until present day. There were key moments where gambling influenced sports integrity, athlete behavior and mental health. We will discuss the explosion of gambling in sports and our responsibilities to our athletes
 
       
12:00 - 12:14 Discussion
 
 
       
12:15 - 12:24

Break to Excuse Non-Members (Members pick up lunch)

The Social (General Session)

       
12:25 - 13:30

Working Lunch: Business Meeting II (Members Only)

The Social (General Session)

       
19:00 - 22:00
Annual Meeting Banquet
The Pavilion
19:00 - 19:45 Break
Cocktail Reception
 
 
       
19:45 - 20:45 Break
Dinner
 
 
       
20:45 - 22:00 Break
Banquet Program
 
   
Description
Welcome and Presidential Address Godfather Introduction & Lecture New Member Introductions Closing and Passing the Gavel Announce 2027 Dates and Location
 
       
06:00 - 06:29
Working Breakfast (Breakfast Served)
The Social Lawn
06:30 - 07:19

Working Breakfast (Case Presentations: Hip)

The Social (General Session)

       
07:20 - 07:29

Break

The Social (General Session)

       
07:30 - 07:34

Welcome and Announcements

The Social (General Session)

    President: Walt R Lowe, MD
Chair: Matthew T. Provencher, MD, MBA
   
07:35 - 08:14

Paper Session 7: Knee – Patellofemoral

The Social (General Session)

    Moderator: Elizabeth Arendt, MD
Moderator: Warren R. Dunn, MD
   
07:35 - 07:40 Advanced Patellofemoral Surgery Using Patient-Specific Instrumentation (PSI): Tubercle & Derotation
 
    Anil Ranawat, MD
 
   
Description
This presentation reviews the application of patient-specific instrumentation (PSI) to optimize accuracy, precision, and safety in tibial tubercle osteotomy and femoral derotation for patellofemoral instability and maltracking. Emphasis is placed on preoperative planning, reproducible execution, and alignment correction to improve biomechanics, surgical accuracy, and patient outcomes.
 
       
07:41 - 07:46 Patellofemoral Instability: A 25-Year Retrospective Review and Evolution of Surgical Management in Military Patients
 
    Craig R Bottoni, MD
 
   
Description
Background: Few studies have reported the long-term outcomes of patellar stabilization surgery in an active-duty military cohort with specific attention to the evolution of surgical management over 20-years at the same institution. Purpose: To evaluate the evolution of surgical management of patellofemoral instability (PFI) in a young, athletic military population. Specifically, we evaluated: 1. The evolution of surgical management of (PFI) over 20+ years at the same institution by a single surgeon. 2. We assessed the long-term results of a combined open and arthroscopic patellar stabilization technique for the treatment of recurrent lateral patellar instability in members of a military population. 3. We assessed the effect of patellar length, specifically patella alta, on the surgical outcomes of patellar stabilization. Methods: We performed a retrospective review of all our patellofemoral operations over a 25-year period to evaluate the evolution of surgical techniques to treat patellofemoral instability (PFI). Secondly, we retrospectively evaluated a consecutive series of 63 patients who underwent operative management for PFI at our medical center between 2003 and 2017. All cases were performed by a single surgeon. Patients with recurrent lateral patellar instability whose nonoperative management failed were included. All patients underwent arthroscopic imbrication of the medial patellar retinaculum, an open lateral retinacular release, and an Elmslie-Trillat tibial tubercle osteotomy. Outcome measures at final follow-up included recurrent instability, need for surgical revision, subjective assessments, and military-specific metrics. We also analyzed anatomic risk factors for failure: patella alta, coronal plane alignment, trochlear dysplasia, and tibial tubercle–trochlear groove distance. Third, we performed a retrospective review of 42 active-duty military patients who received a medializing tibial-tubercle osteotomy for PFI by a single surgeon with a minimum of two-year follow-up. T-test, Chi square, and univariate logistic regression were used to determine if patella alta was associated Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE) scores, post-operative pain, recurrent instability, need for revision surgery, or an adverse outcome resulting in military activity limitations or medical separation. Results: The 25-year evolution of surgical management of PFI demonstrated a transition from isolated tibial tubercle osteotomy (TTO) - primarily an Emlslie-Trillat lateral based medialization, to a combined approach involving a arthroscopic medial imbrication combined with a TTO. Over the past 10 years, transition to an MPFL reconstruction, with or without a TTO, has become more common. Distal femoral osteotomies to correct genu valgum have been consistently used with or without MPFL reconstruction to assess coronal plane malalignment in the setting of PFI. Additionally, the use of a derotational osteotomy is rarely, but, when necessary, performed for rotational malalignment with PFI. To assess patella alta, a total of 51 patients were included (34 men, 17 women; mean ± SD age at surgery, 27.2 ± 5.8 years; mean follow-up, 5.3 years). The mean postoperative SANE score (Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation) was 75.0 ± 17.7, and the mean visual analog scale pain score was 2.5 ± 2.1. Four patients (7.8%) reported redislocation events, and 4 underwent revision surgery. Twenty-five patients (49.0%) reported a decrease in activity level as compared with pre-injury, while 10 (19.6%) cited restrictions in activities of daily living. Of the 21 patients remaining on active duty, 6 (28.6%) required an activity-limiting medical profile. Of the 48 active-duty patients, 12 (25.0%) underwent evaluation by a medical board for separation from the military. Differences in the Caton-Deschamps Index and tibial tubercle–trochlear groove distance between surgical success and failure were not statistically significant. Conclusion: Surgical management of patellofemoral instability in military beneficiaries was assessed and tracked to ascertain changes in operative management by a single surgeon over a 25-year period. The use of osteotomies and soft tissue reconstructions has been the mainstay of operative treatment. Utilizing a multifaceted technique resulted in low recurrence rates and may be independent of predisposing anatomic risk factors for instability. At long-term follow, most patients retained their active-duty status, although nearly half experienced a decrease in activity level. When assessing our data, patella alta is not an independent risk factor for poor outcomes following a medializing tibial-tubercle osteotomy for the management of lateral patella instability in our population. There is a trend towards increased adverse outcomes, revision surgery, and recurrent instability in patients with patella alta; however, no significant relationship was observed. Notably, however, female sex is a significant predictor of adverse outcomes.
 
       
07:47 - 07:52 Use of portable ultrasound to quantify patellar instability
 
    Miho Jean Tanaka, MD, PhD
 
   
Description
Patellar instability can be difficult to evaluate precisely. Diagnosis typically requires dynamic evaluation, and currently no quantifiable measurements for patellar instability exist. This presentation discusses the development of portable ultrasound-guided measurements to reproducibly assess and quantify patellar instability before and after treatment.
 
       
07:53 - 07:58 A Novel Classification of Articular Cartilage Grafting and Regeneration
 
    James Carey, MD, MPH
 
   
Description
We present a novel five-category classification system for cartilage grafting and regeneration, analogous to established bone graft frameworks, developed through an AI-assisted scoping review and synthesis. The categories (and associated Greek names) were as follows: providing load-bearing and force-dissipating capacity (chondrodynamic); providing a smooth and resilient surface (chondrolissic); filling the defect volume (chondroplerotic); integrating with and adhering to defect margins (chondrosyndetic); and supporting matrix synthesis and cellular activity (chondrobiotic). Further validation and consensus-building are needed to refine and implement this framework in clinical and research settings.
 
       
07:59 - 08:14 Discussion
 
 
       
08:15 - 08:54

Symposium 6: Medical Care for the 'Amateur' Athlete in the Age of NIL, Agents, and the Transfer Portal – Lessons Learned/What can we do better

The Social (General Session)

    Matthew J Matava, MD
Panelist: Brian D Busconi, MD
Panelist: Thomas Hackett, MD
Panelist: Mary Lloyd Ireland, MD
Panelist: Lee D Kaplan, MD
Panelist: James E Tibone, MD
   
08:55 - 09:39

Paper Session 8: Knee – Osteotomy/Cartilage – Update 2026

The Social (General Session)

    Moderator: Andreas H Gomoll, MD
Moderator: Rene Verdonk, MD . PhD
   
08:55 - 09:00 Functional Outcomes and Return to Sport Following ACL Reconstruction with Slope Reducing Osteotomy in Athletes
 
    Walt R Lowe, MD
 
   
Description
A case series presentation of 9 athletes (3 D1 collegiate, 6 high school) who returned to sport following ACL reconstruction with slope reducing osteotomy. Surgical details and functional testing/return to sport data would be presented. This would include discussion of indications for the procedure, surgical technique, and the potential role of the slope reducing osteotomy in athletic populations.
 
       
09:01 - 09:06 Put Some Bounce in Your Step: 5-Year Results of an Implantable Shock Absorber in Patients with Medial Knee Osteoarthritis
 
    David R Diduch, MD
 
   
Description
Background: Osteoarthritis (OA) in patients too young for arthroplasty or who are not ready to give up high impact activities can be a challenging problem. The Medial Implantable Shock Absorber (MISHA) is a new option to help bridge these patients until arthroplasty is more appropriate, and preliminary results were presented at Herodicus 4 years ago. This study assesses the long-term, 5-year outcomes of the MISHA. Methods: This prospective, open-label, comparative cohort study was conducted in 10 centers in the United States and Europe. The following outcomes were evaluated at the 5-year follow up visits: WOMAC Pain and Function, freedom from conversion to TKA/ UKA/ HTO, implant removal, and device-related complications. Results: Eighty-one participants received the MISHA. Participants had a statistically significant improvement in WOMAC pain (mean 43.4 point improvement, p<0.0001) and function (mean 42.1 point improvement, p<0.0001) that started at 6 weeks post-surgery, and maintained a significant and clinically important change from baseline through the 5-year follow-up. Neither KL grade nor knee alignment were correlated with outcomes. A total of 73/81 (90.1%) participants were free from conversion to arthroplasty or HTO at five years. One (1/81, 1.2%) participant had an HTO, four (4.9%) converted to UKA, and three (3.7%) converted to TKA at five years. Participants who had their MISHA removed without conversion still had statistically significant improvements in pain and function, even after their device was removed. Conclusion: MISHA provided benefits that were both statistically significant and clinically meaningful for at least 5 years in patients who fall within the OA treatment gap between failure of non-surgical care and the time when arthroplasty is elected. Based on these long-term data reporting clinically meaningful outcomes improvement and durable, conversion-free survivorship, the MISHA has proven itself to be a treatment option for knee OA patients.
 
       
09:07 - 09:12 Two-Year Outcomes Using the Novel Multi-Directional Tibial Tubercle Transfer (MD3T) System To Correct Patellofemoral Malalignment
 
    Seth L Sherman, MD
 
   
Description
This is a prospective cohort of 82 consecutive patients who underwent tibial tubercle osteotomy (TTO) using the MD3T System. Designed to overcome the steep learning curve and technical challenges of traditional TTO, this novel approach provides modularity and precision across a variety of single plane (i.e. anteriorization, distalization) and multiplane (i.e. AMZ, AMZ+ distalization) correction types. At minimum two-year follow-up, the technique demonstrated favorable radiographic union rate with no cases of hardware failure or non-union. We report a 2% hardware removal rate, which is significantly lower than historical averages (p < 0.001). Patients achieved statistically significant and clinically meaningful improvements in IKDC and KOOS scores, exceeding established MCID thresholds for both pain and instability. Our findings suggest that the multi-directional technique offers a reproducible and teachable solution for complex patellofemoral malalignment.
 
       
09:13 - 09:18 Bad to the bone: Options for bone edema, subchondral cysts after knee OCA
 
    Alison P Toth, MD
 
   
Description
Discuss the challenging complication of nonunion/poor healing of an osteochondral allograft (OCA) which presents with knee pain, bone marrow edema, subchondral cysts.
 
       
09:19 - 09:24 Outcomes of Arthroscopic Particulated Juvenile Articular Cartilage Repair versus other Techniques for Full-Thickness Cartilage Lesions of the Knee
 
    Jason L. Dragoo, MD
 
   
Description
Purpose: To evaluate patient outcomes following arthroscopic particulated juvenile articular cartilage (APJAC; DeNovo NT®) implantation, osteochondral allograft (OCA) transplantation, and microfracture (MFx) for treatment of full-thickness cartilage lesions in the knee with a minimum 24-month follow-up. Methods: This retrospective cohort study included 98 unilateral cases with International Cartilage Repair Society grade IV chondral knee lesions treated with APJAC (N=34), OCA (N=33), or MFx (N=31) between 2016 and 2024. Demographics, lesion characteristics, and surgical details were obtained from medical records. Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) and Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) subscales were compared between baseline and a minimum of 24 months postoperatively using Wilcoxon signed-rank tests. Linear mixed-effects models with random intercepts for patients were constructed a priori to evaluate longitudinal associations between outcomes and prespecified covariates (age, sex, BMI, smoking exposure, laterality, lesion area and compartment, and common concomitant procedures). Results: Mean follow-up was 3.9 years (range: 2.0-9.6). Baseline demographics were similar across treatment groups, though larger defects were treated using APJAC (average 2.9cm2) and OCA (average 2.7cm2) compared with MFx (average 2.4cm2, p < 0.001). All KOOS and WOMAC subscales improved from baseline to 24 months across all three cohorts (all p < 0.044). In longitudinal mixed-effects models, higher BMI was associated with worse outcomes, averaging a 0.8-point decrease per unit across multiple subscales. At 24 months, APJAC demonstrated superior outcomes compared with MFx in 7/9 domains and outcomes comparable to OCA across all domains after adjusting for prespecified covariates. No acute graft displacements occurred, and revision rates were similar across cohorts. Conclusions: APJAC implantation was associated with meaningful two-year improvements in patient-reported outcomes and demonstrated outcomes superior to MFx and comparable to OCA transplantation across most domains, despite treatment of larger lesions. These findings support APJAC as a valid treatment option for full-thickness knee cartilage lesions, while highlighting the need for longer-term studies to assess result durability.
 
       
09:25 - 09:39 Discussion
 
 
       
09:40 - 09:54
Break
The Social Lawn
09:55 - 10:29

Symposium 7: Orthobiologics – What Is The Latest in 2026? From Evidence to Business Models

The Social (General Session)

    Jason L. Dragoo, MD
Panelist: Constance R Chu, MD
Panelist: Mary Lloyd Ireland, MD
Panelist: Darren L Johnson, MD
Panelist: Scott Rodeo, MD
   
10:30 - 11:09

Symposium 8: Artificial Intelligence in Sports Medicine: Hype or Reality?

The Social (General Session)

    Moderator: Jonathan Bravman, MD
Moderator: David R McAllister, MD
   
10:30 - 10:39 Lecture
Artificial Intelligence Across the Rotator Cuff Care Pathway: Imaging Accuracy, Prognosis, and Clinical Decision Support
 
    Savio L-Y. Woo, PhD, DSc, DEng
 
 
       
10:40 - 10:45 Electroencephalogram Biofeedback Training Through a Brain Computer Interface Following Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction
 
    Brian Forsythe, MD
 
   
Description
Introduction: Across the globe, knee surgeries comprise the majority of surgical procedures in athletes, with anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions (ACLR) accounting for a substantial proportion of these operations. Given the relatively high frequency of these procedures within soccer and football, the management and rehabilitation of ALCR in this population presents a unique area of focus for novel rehabilitation protocols and technologies. Arthrogenic muscle inhibition (AMI) is a well-recognized and relatively common complication following anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction, occurring to some degree in nearly 60% of patients. AMI most commonly manifests as impaired quadriceps activation, which can result in gait abnormalities and present a significant barrier to effective postoperative rehabilitation. In professional athletes, delays in neuromuscular recovery may have substantial consequences, including prolonged return-to-play timelines, diminished team performance, and potential financial implications related to athlete compensation. Accordingly, strategies aimed at mitigating AMI and expediting rehabilitation are of particular importance in this population. Previous work investigating both motor imagery and the integration of biofeedback into rehabilitation has demonstrated promise in mitigating deficits associated with arthrogenic muscle inhibition (AMI) and improving functional recovery. The purpose of the present study is to evaluate the efficacy of a novel electroencephalogram (EEG)–based biofeedback training protocol that integrates traditional motor imagery with real-time EEG feedback to enhance postoperative outcomes following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR). This technology has previously been utilized by professional clubs across Major League Soccer (MLS), LaLiga, and Serie A to enhance athletic performance among non-injured players. By adapting this established performance-training platform for postoperative rehabilitation, the current study seeks to extend the application of this technology to the recovery setting. Leveraging EEG-guided motor imagery during rehabilitation may improve neuromuscular recovery, accelerate return-to-sport timelines, and facilitate a more efficient return to competitive play following ACLR. Methods: A preliminary exploratory comparison of two patients was performed between the first intervention subject and a matched control from an ongoing randomized, blinded clinical trial (Intervention: 29-year-old male, 86 kg; Control: 29-year-old female, 68kg). By April 2026, we expect to have reportable data from 10 participants. All participants followed a standardized postoperative physical therapy protocol, with the intervention group completing additional 20-minute EEG biofeedback sessions twice weekly for 8 weeks, starting at the first therapy visit. Training involves motor-imagery visualization with real-time EEG feedback to reinforce activation of motor pathways. Markerless motion capture recorded overground gait, bilateral squats, and forward lunges at 2, 4, and 6 months postoperatively, with outcome assessors blinded to group allocation. Knee kinematics, range of motion, peak knee flexion angles, and peak knee flexion moments were reported. Surface EMG was used to detect quadriceps and hamstring activation throughout the testing protocol. Results: Both patients demonstrated gains in stance-phase knee ROM over the follow-up period (Fig 1), though the intervention patient showed greater improvement. Stance-phase ROM more than doubled from 2 to 6 months (+7.2°), driven by increased early-stance flexion and improved mid-stance extension (+3.7°). The control patient showed smaller ROM gains (+2.9°) but similarly improved mid-stance extension by 6 months (+6.6°). First-peak knee flexion moments, however, diverged. By 6 months, the intervention patient increased from 0.13 to 0.29 %BW·m, indicating improved quadriceps loading, whereas the control patient decreased from 0.37 to 0.22 %BW·m, consistent with continued quadriceps avoidance. The intervention patient showed elevated semitendinosus activation at 4 months during lunges and squats, with a subsequent reduction at 6mo. This pattern was mirrored by the co-contraction index, which increased at 4mo and subsequently decreased at 6 months for both tasks. In contrast, the control subject exhibited higher rectus femoris activation at 4 months during both the lunge and squat, with a subsequent decrease at 6months, reflecting an opposing temporal pattern. Conclusion: Preliminary results suggest EEG biofeedback may enhance early quadriceps activation and stance-phase knee mechanics following ACLR. Overall, the intervention patient demonstrated more substantial gains in both ROM and flexion moment, suggesting improved quadriceps engagement and progression toward normative gait mechanics. Further data is needed to confirm these effects.
 
       
10:46 - 10:51 Artificial Intelligence and Sports Medicine
 
   
Description
Phil Page
 
       
10:52 - 10:57 Artificial Intelligence Across the Rotator Cuff Care Pathway: Imaging Accuracy, Prognosis, and Clinical Decision Support
 
    Jason L Koh, MD, MBA
 
   
Description
Introduction Artificial intelligence (AI) is rapidly reshaping orthopaedic care and clinical practice, with growing applications in imaging, predictive modeling, and surgical decision-making. Rotator cuff tears represent a prevalent and formidable challenge in the field of shoulder surgery. Achieving an accurate diagnosis is paramount, as it lays the foundation for tailored treatment planning and significantly influences the prognosis. Moreover, implementing effective strategies for re-tear prevention is crucial in ensuring optimal surgical outcomes. Addressing these elements with rigor not only enhances patient recovery but also reduces the long-term burden of shoulder dysfunction.AI-based imaging models have demonstrated improved accuracy in detecting and characterizing rotator cuff pathology, while deep learning algorithms have been developed to predict re-tear risk following repair. Despite the progress made in the field, the existing literature remains disjointed, with the majority of studies focusing on specific, isolated aspects of care. This systematic review seeks to integrate the prevailing evidence regarding the application of artificial intelligence in the management of rotator cuff tears throughout the perioperative continuum, encompassing preoperative imaging, surgical planning, prognostic modeling, and postoperative rehabilitation. Methods This systematic review was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. A comprehensive literature search was performed across PubMed, Scopus, and Embase from database inception to May 2025. The search strategy combined terms related to artificial intelligence, machine learning, and deep learning with terms for rotator cuff tears and rotator cuff repair. Eligible studies included those addressing AI-based imaging diagnosis, prognostic modeling, surgical planning, or postoperative outcome prediction. The following data were extracted and recorded: image modality/plane, input features, age, gender, diagnosis (rotator cuff tears), ground truth references, AI algorithm, pretrained CNN, size of training set, size of testing set, size of validation set or validation method, and model performance (accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, AUC). The data extracted from the included studies were narratively reviewed. Results A total of 59 relevant studies were incorporated into the analysis. The results demonstrate that artificial intelligence (AI) exhibits strong diagnostic accuracy for rotator cuff tears across various imaging modalities. Convolutional neural network (CNN)-based models utilizing magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) achieved diagnostic accuracies exceeding 90% in multiple studies, with ultrasound-based models exhibiting comparable performance. Several studies applied AI to surgical planning, using preoperative imaging and clinical features to guide decision-making and optimize repair strategies. Prognostic applications focused on re-tear risk and functional outcomes: deep learning models achieved AUCs of 0.87–0.92 for re-tear prediction. In contrast, machine learning approaches predicted postoperative improvement with accuracies up to 96.9% internally and 79.6% externally validated. Across studies, ensemble methods (XGBoost, LightGBM) consistently outperformed logistic regression, underscoring the potential of AI to extend beyond diagnosis into prognosis and recovery trajectories. Discussion This systematic review illustrates the expanding role of artificial intelligence throughout the continuum of rotator cuff management, encompassing preoperative imaging interpretation to postoperative outcome prediction. An analysis of over 230,000 patients and imaging datasets reveals that AI consistently demonstrates robust diagnostic accuracy, particularly in the detection of conditions via MRI and ultrasound. These findings underscore the potential of AI as a dependable complement to the work of radiologists. Prognostic models, including deep learning algorithms predicting retear risk after repair, showed AUC values exceeding 0.80 in several studies, highlighting their promise in stratifying high-risk patients. Applications in surgical planning and rehabilitation remain underexplored, though preliminary work suggests feasibility in quantifying tendon healing and guiding individualized recovery. These findings suggest AI can augment each step of rotator cuff management by enhancing diagnostic precision, informing surgical decision-making, and predicting outcomes. Nonetheless, heterogeneity in datasets and lack of external validation remain significant barriers to clinical adoption. Future multicenter prospective studies are needed to validate these tools and integrate AI into clinical workflows.
 
       
10:58 - 11:09 Discussion
 
 
       
11:10 - 11:44

Paper Session 9: Elbow/Hip

The Social (General Session)

    Moderator: Bryan Kelly, MD
Moderator: Marc J Philippon, MD
   
11:10 - 11:15 Effects of Joint Hypermobility on Ulnar Collateral Ligament Laxity in Professional Baseball Pitchers
 
    Steven B Cohen, MD
 
   
Description
Background: Generalized joint hypermobility has been linked to ligamentous injury in several joints, but its impact on medial elbow stability in baseball pitchers remains unclear. Prior MRI studies have suggested that hypermobile elbows demonstrate altered joint congruence, but it remains unknown whether this translates to increased medial ulnohumeral joint gapping with valgus stress in pitchers. Purpose/Hypothesis: To determine whether joint hypermobility as measured by a modified unilateral Beighton score is related to ulnar collateral ligament (UCL) laxity in professional baseball pitchers. The authors hypothesized that pitchers with higher Beighton scores would have increased UCL laxity compared to pitchers with lower Beighton scores. Study Design: Cross-sectional study (level IV) Methods: Healthy minor league baseball pitchers from a single professional baseball organization were enrolled during 2021-2025 preseason medical evaluations. Enrolled pitchers underwent bilateral elbow ultrasound examination of the ulnohumeral joint gapping utilizing the Telos device in both unstressed and valgus stressed (150 N) positions. Players also underwent unilateral modified Beighton scoring of the throwing shouldernon-throwing upper extremity. The difference in ulnohumeral joint gapping from stressed (150 N) to unstressed (i.e. delta value) was calculated. The relationships between Beighton score and UCL laxity in the stressed and unstressed positions, as well as delta values, were determined using both one-way ANOVA and Spearmans correlation. Results: Overall, 158 professional baseball pitchers with an average age of 23±3 years were included, with 33 (21%) having a history of elbow surgery. One-way ANOVA found no significant differences in UCL laxity while stressed (p=0.594), relaxed (p=0.828), or for delta values (p=0.460) based on Beighton score. There were also no significant differences in UCL laxity while stressed, relaxed, or for delta values after isolating pitchers with vs. without history of elbow surgery (all p>0.05). Conclusion: Beighton score has no association with UCL valgus laxity in professional pitchers. This information can assure clinicians that Beighton score does not need to be accounted for when assessing ulnohumeral joint gapping in professional pitchers.
 
       
11:16 - 11:21 Revision of Prior UCL Reconstruction using Internal Brace Repair: A Single Surgeon Case Series
 
    Jeffrey R Dugas, MD
 
   
Description
A pending publication in OJSM single-surgeon case series of 10 failed UCL reconstructions in elite level throwers using Repair with Internal Brace.
 
       
11:22 - 11:27 Hip Arthroscopy in the Presence of Dysplasia: Revisiting the Bifid Peroneal Tendon
 
    JW Thomas Byrd, MD
 
   
Description
Hip Arthroscopy in the Presence of Dysplasia: Revisiting the Bifid Peroneal Tendon This study will report on the 25 year follow-up of a previously published series of patients from 2003.
 
       
11:28 - 11:33 Problem solving
 
    Lanny L Johnson, M.D.
 
   
Description
An Effective Adjunct to the Standard of Care for the Prevention of Orthopedic Infections and Treatment of Prosthetic Joint Infection; Topical methylene blue. The prevention of surgical site infection and treatment thereof, especially that of prosthetic joint infection (PJI) is a long felt unmet need in orthopedic surgery. Bacteria are in every surgical wound. Recent studies show that bacterial colonization increases by 50% over the course of a one-hour surgery. Only a small number of bacteria are necessary to result in an infection. Legacy antibiotics are the primary means of infection control. Legacy is used as there has only been one new class of antibiotics in last 40 years. Those new companies with FDA approval have gone bankrupt in one year due to no return on investment. Bacterial resistance exists for Legacy antibiotics, especially for MRSA or Cutibacterium acnes. There is a need for an additional reagent or adjunct to the standard of care to reduce the incidence of infection and or more effectively treat PJI. Recent animal studies have shown that topical methylene blue has the potential to sterilize a surgical wound intentionally contaminated with Log6 of MRSA and or Cutibacterium acnes as soon as 10 minutes and duration of at least 50 more minutes. The wound is rendered uninfected when cultured at 7 days. Methylene blue (MB) has long published history of an of label use in many medical and surgical treatments. Multiple publications on use in effective wound care, i.e. identifying sinus tracts, identifying necrotic tissue for debridement in chronic wounds. Most problematic in PJI is the diagnosis and treatment of C. acnes. The reason is that C. acnes has two interchangeable forms, with and without a capsule. The latter is designated as the L-form. The two biologically structural forms morph back and forth over their life span. It is literally “now you see me, now you don’t”. In addition, they reside in a protective home of biofilms or tissue. The capsulated form takes weeks in culture to identify. The invisible L-form evades detection persisting even after legacy antibiotics. A rarely used special culture medium is necessary to identify the L-form. Hence the diagnostic dilemmas and challenging treatment protocols. Topical Methylene blue dye stains this bacterium, its biofilms and tissue holding them. Most legacy antibiotics have no effect on the L-form of C. acne. However topical methylene blue identifies for debridement and also irradicates. Topical methylene blue also removes MRSA in a wound. Topical MB has antimicrobial properties but is not designated as an antibiotic. 0.5% MB is FDA approved for intravenous treatment of methemoglobinemia. Therefore, the off label use designated under the license to practice medicine. Topically applied MB identifies the loose and necrotic tissue to be debrided at conclusion of surgery while incidentally removing the bacterial bioburden. MB injected 10 minutes prior to surgery for PJI identifies by stain the extent of the cavity and recesses for debridement. MB identifies the biofilms on implants for debridement. MB removes the bacterial bioburden. Methylene blue is a safe and effective topical adjunct to the standard of care for prevention of surgical infection and the treatment of PJI.
 
       
11:34 - 11:44 Discussion
 
 
       
11:45 - 11:50

Closing Ceremonies and Adjourn

The Social (General Session)

    President: Walt R Lowe, MD
President: Matthew T. Provencher, MD, MBA
Chair: Jeffrey R Dugas, MD
   

Annual Meeting Godparent : Dr. Peter Indelicato

Dr. Indelicato has been a long time thought leader in Sports Medicine and supporter of the AOSSM throughout his career. He is currently an Emeritus Professor of Sports Medicine in the Department of Orthopedic Surgery at the University of Florida. During his tenure, he has served as the Head Team Physician of the Florida Gators for 35 years, the Associate Team Physician for the NFL Miami Dolphins for 9 years, and the Wayne Huizenga Professor of Sports Medicine at the university for more than 20 years.

Dr Indelicato graduated from New York Medical College in 1969 and was awarded that Medal of Honor from New York Medical College in 2007. He successfully completed his orthopedic residency at New York University in 1974 and then he served as Lt Commander in the US Navy and was stationed as a staff orthopedic surgeon at Corpus Christi Naval Station. Two years later, he successfully completed a year long Sports Medicine Fellowship at the Kerlan-Jobe Orthopedic Clinic in Los Angeles. In1977, he was appointed as chief of the Sports Medicine Service in the Department of Orthopedic Surgery at the University of Florida College of Medicine.

Dr Indelicato has served as the 40th president of the AOSSM in July,2011. The AOSSM is the world leading society in Sports Medicine focused on advancing clinical and research knowledge internationally. As president, he oversaw the Society’s annual meeting that year in Baltimore, Md.

He has served as the Chair of the Commercial Relations Committee for the AOSSM and now serves as the Society’s Corporate Relations Liaison. Recently, he chaired the Team Physician and Athletes Advocacy Committee. In 2002, he was named the AOSSSM “Godfather” for the traveling fellowship to Europe and toured seven of the major sports medicine centers in five different countries. The following year, he was elected president of the Herodicus Society, an international group of Sports Medicine specialists who meet annually to exchange promising new ideas on how to best manage musculoskeletal injuries in athletes.

Over the past twenty years he has served as an independent consultant for large multinational companies such as Arthrex and Regeneration Technologies.

Dr Indelicato has, over the course of his career, authored over 60 articles on the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) and his main area of research has been focused on knee ligament injuries. He published the landmark article on the successful non-operative management of complete isolated tears of the medial collateral ligament (MCL) in 1983 and has subsequently published many articles on the use of allograft tissue as an option for ACL reconstruction. He has also co-authored 15 articles focusing and “Team Physician Consensus Statements’ aimed at improving the quality of health care to student athletes everywhere. Over the past 40 years, he has been invited to give more than 400 lectures nationally/internationally as well as co-authored more than 11 book chapters. His international speaking invitations have included lectures in China, Southeast Asia, Europe, Iceland, Central and South America. In November,2021, Dr Indelicato was invited by the Ecuadorian Ministry of Health to consult with their Sports Medicine team in Quito, Ecuador and was named Honored Professor at the 2021 Annual OSET meeting in Las Vegas. He was invited to be a guest speaker at the Argentina Arthroscopy Association annual meeting in Buenos Aires in September, 2022.

Besides taking care of professional athletes in New York and Los Angeles, Dr. Indelicato has also been the associate team physician for the Miami Dolphins from 1988-1994 and was named “SEC Team Physician of the Year” in 2003. Between 1997-2000, he served as an independent examiner for the NFL. He was given the Dr. Robert Cade Sports Medicine Person of the Year Award in 2007, the Jack Hughston Award by the SEATA in 2015, the Distinguished Southern Orthopedic Surgeon Award by the SOA in 2016 and the Gwinnett “Pioneer of Sports Medicine Award that same year. At the Annual AOSSM meeting in 2016, he received the Robert E. Leach Sports Medicine Leadership Award in recognition and appreciation for his outstanding and meritorious service to Sports Medicine throughout the world . Later that same year, he was given the coveted Jack Wheatley Award by the National Athletic Trainers Association for a lifetime of outstanding contributions that directly impact health care in the area of athletics, athletic training, for his major and lasting importance. In July, 2019 Dr. Indelicato was inducted in the AOSSM Hall of Fame, the highest honor given to a society member recognizing their significant contributions to the specialty of Sports Medicine. In May, 2023, he was awarded the James Andrews “Excellence in Football” award. Most recently, Dr Indelicato was invited to give the first Legacy Champ Baker Presentation at the 75th anniversary of the Jack Hughston Society meeting in Columbus, Georgia.